Communications, verified.

StoryFlow verifies every claim against your evidence once, then helps you reuse it to reach audiences everywhere. Governed communications, out the door without the wait. Speed or scrutiny. Pick both.

24–72 hrs
Brief to published.

A typical corporate approval cycle runs six to eight weeks.

177K documents

Behind every claim: your source data, sector benchmarks, high-stakes communications expertise, communications science, and legal guardrails against overclaiming.

4
Reviewers on every claim.

Skeptical Auditor. Domain Expert. Regulatory Officer. Stakeholder Advocate. Before any human signs off.

Cutting through the noise

Publishing got easy. Being trusted didn't.

Reports, disclosures, social posts, investor updates. The volume keeps climbing. There is more information than ever, and much of it can't be relied on. Organizations need a better way to position themselves as credible, authoritative sources.

But high-stakes communications present a minefield for those who venture in. A contentious claim becomes a lawsuit two years later. An unverifiable statement is the first thing a regulator flags when the filing gets a second look. And false information that does the most damage is the one that never reaches a courtroom at all: the claim a journalist or short-seller unravels in public, where the retraction gets a fraction of the reach the original claim did.

Electric Synapse is built to play defense and offense simultaneously. The platform runs on subject-matter depth in high-stakes communications (ESG, pharma, financial services, litigation) paired with a strategy engine that plans against your actual budget, not a template. Every claim, once verified, gets produced across the formats that reach the people who decide and the systems that determine what those people see.

Lower the risk. Then use the same verified communications operating system to grow revenue, retain talent, and open capital.

THE AUDIENCE HAS CHANGED

Machines and people need to trust your claims.

Human Readers

The people who decide.

The journalist.The analyst.The regulator.
The journalist on deadline who can't find the source behind your number.
The analyst modeling on a figure whose basis was never published alongside it.
The regulator asking, months later, for the chain of evidence behind a statement your team barely remembers approving.
Machine Readers

The machines that route them.

The AI overview.The summary.The model.
The AI overview answering questions about your company from a competitor's framing of your numbers.
The summary that drops the methodology that made your claim defensible.
The model that learned your story from a journalist's paraphrase, because you never published a version machines could read.

Humans decide whether to believe it. AI decides whether to repeat it. StoryFlow builds for both, from the start.

How it works

One brief and your source data. Six steps later, it's published.

  1. Extract
  2. Benchmark
  3. Plan
  4. Produce
  5. Distribute
  6. Monitor
1 · ExtractThe platform reads your documents and pulls out every claim worth making: milestones, numbers, results.
2 · BenchmarkOur system compares each claim against sector peers, so you know whether "we cut emissions 12%" is a headline or a liability before you say it.
3 · PlanThe strategy engine builds the full plan: which audiences, which channels, which formats, what budget.
4 · ProduceNineteen formats run in parallel, from regulatory filings to social posts, all drawing on the same verified claims rather than being rewritten independently.
5 · DistributeAssets ship to all audiences at once: the channels people read and the ones AI systems learn from.
6 · MonitorAfter publication, the platform tracks whether audiences are retrieving and citing your version of the narrative.

All of your organization's verified information compounds. Every approved claim stays in the ledger. The next piece reuses it instead of re-verifying it. The more you publish, the faster publishing gets.

Trust

Every claim, on the record.

The ledger records every claim your organization makes: what it was based on, who approved it, when, and every change since. Each entry seals the one before it, so if anyone alters a past claim, the record shows it.

CLAIM 001 CLAIM 002 CLAIM 003 source ↗ data approver ✓ hash a91f… source ↗ data approver ✓ hash 7c2e… source ↗ data approver ✓ hash d048… prev → prev → t₀ t₁ t₂
Fig. 1 — Each claim seals the previous one. Altering any prior entry breaks every hash downstream.

When the regulator asks for the evidence chain months later, you reconstruct it in minutes.

When a greenwashing suit demands your records, they're tamper-evident and already built.

When the CEO asks, "Can we stand behind every word in this report?", the answer no longer depends on who happens to be in the room.

Where the wrong claim is an event

ESGSustainability claims under CSRD, California, and a growing list of jurisdictions' climate disclosure rules, plus supply chain scrutiny. One overclaim is a greenwashing suit.
PharmaceuticalsPromotional communications under FDA enforcement, where every claim needs an MLR-ready chain of custody.
EnergyEmissions and safety claims under FERC and NERC, watched in real time during any incident. A misstated figure becomes a filing.
Food & agricultureSourcing and safety claims under FDA and USDA. A recall turns yesterday's marketing line into evidence.
The studio

When the stakes call for one-of-a-kind, human storytelling.

Some communications need senior creative talent: film, design, editorial. Electric Synapse Studio builds them, working from the same verified claims as everything else you publish. The craft is human. The claims are already checked.

See the studio's work

— ENTRY POINTS

The studio is open. The platform is taking design partners.

If you need communications that hold up, start here.